Lenovo 82B5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemLenovo 82B5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '20 at 18:55
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 127
2-Core 233
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 788
74% 600 Pts
64-Core 1,083
73% 1,083 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3A3E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.40.34.04
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44% Average
Lighting 57.6
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 50.3
46% 55.6 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 48.6
Splatting 50.6
41% 54.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44%
Great: 46%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GD9TNI-L2A0B 256GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11010C10
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,100
Write 1,598
Mixed 1,196
292% 1,298 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 73.5
247% 86.8 MB/s
DQ Read 924
DQ Write 846
DQ Mixed 765
607% 845 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 214%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 28.7
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 22.9
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 82B5 Builds (Compare 4,680 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82B5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback