Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Razer Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer LY320
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190910
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '20 at 17:41
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 61.1 1-Core 126 2-Core 251 77% 146 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 650 66% 535 Pts	64-Core 639 40% 639 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 70%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB 1,156 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1069 829 747 633 559 523 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	224% Outstanding	Read 1,686 Write 1456 Mixed 1,095 SusWrite 727 277% 1,241 MB/s	4K Read 55.6 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 74.1 248% 86.6 MB/s	DQ Read 842 DQ Write 753 DQ Mixed 788 594% 794 MB/s
Poor: 225% ↑ This bench: 224% Great: 381%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GB 7,828 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 45.1 MC Write 44.8 MC Mixed 40.6 124% 43.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 37.8 SC Mixed 26 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 119%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	264x

GPU
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	142x
GTX 1650 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 36%, 6,904 samples	90x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	5x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	67x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	53x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	33x

RAM
K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GBSamsungBench 104%, 7,828 samples	256x
2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 3,676 samples	8x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16