Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z370M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z370M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '20 at 00:30
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$161
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 272
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 842
83% 677 Pts
64-Core 1,046
65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.98
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.5% Above average
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 57.7
54% 64 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 63.9
Splatting 62.3
52% 63.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$74
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,066
Write 1,421
Mixed 538
294% 1,342 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 55.2
231% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1050
DQ Write 951
DQ Mixed 656
586% 886 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
435GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 420 415 406 422 424 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 424
Mixed 343
SusWrite 419
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 47
156% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 294
240% 342 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 111%
Great: 125%
WDC WDS1 00T2B0B 1TB
479GB free
Firmware: X611
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 386 384 384 387 389 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 330
Write 362
Mixed 272
SusWrite 385
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 26.8
81% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 30.2
52% 99.5 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 120%
G-drive SSD 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 376 369 372 373 370 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
69% Good
Read 307
Write 377
Mixed 270
SusWrite 372
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 27.6
85% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 28.5
58% 117 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
438GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 156 154 155 155 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 124
Write 92.7
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 155
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 109%
Drobo Gen3 17.5TB
11TB free, PID 3344
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 141 189 145 150 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 0.5
Write 22.2
Mixed 3
SusWrite 151
71% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.3
181% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$48
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 26.4
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 27.5
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 55.9
72% 55.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M-ITX/ac - $151

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $519
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback