Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 12,140 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	Memory 4.61 1-Core 56.3 2-Core 108 26% 56.3 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 211 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 191 12% 191 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605 14,651 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6860 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	2.52% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 3.54 Parallax 2.62 2% 2.89 fps	MRender 4.19 Gravity 3.43 Splatting 4.78 4% 4.14 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.52% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM128GDHTNG-8310A 128GB 4,082 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80060C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 151 150 149 146 148 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 422 Write 150 Mixed 246 SusWrite 149 53% 242 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 63.9 4K Mixed 20.7 92% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 198 149% 203 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 132%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4F8E304HB-MGCJ 4x1GB 1,067 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 11 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 457 9% 457 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium Silver N5000IntelBench 34%, 12,140 samples	45x
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	10x

GPU
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	45x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	10x

SSD
HFS128G39TNF-N3A0A 128GBBench 69%, 765 samples	15x
MZNLN128HAHQ-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 747 samples	13x
TOSHIBA 128GBKbg30zmt128gBench 83%, 5,624 samples	10x

RAM
K4F8E304HB-MGCJ 4x1GBSamsungBench 19%, 1,067 samples	39x
H9HCNNN8KUMLHR 4x1GBHynixBench 18%, 593 samples	10x
MT53B256M32D1NP-062 WT:C 4x1GBMicronBench 21%, 98 samples	6x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16