Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191206
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '20 at 17:36
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 77.6 1-Core 104 2-Core 209 73% 130 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 653 63% 520 Pts	64-Core 1,060 66% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 8620) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	18.3% Very poor	Lighting 20.7 Reflection 23.8 Parallax 0.06 17% 14.9 fps	MRender 29.5 Gravity 20.7 Splatting 27 21% 25.7 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CHN 25SATAA3 360 360GB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 361 1.5 1.2 8.5 7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 280 Write 352 Mixed 225 SusWrite 65.5 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 13.7 4K Mixed 12 40% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 75.7 DQ Write 8.1 DQ Mixed 0.7 11% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 87%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 143GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 433 314 414 422 352 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 483 Write 465 Mixed 446 SusWrite 393 101% 447 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 84.9 4K Mixed 48.4 162% 56.6 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 370 279% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 129%
I-O DATA HDC-U 320GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 89GB free, PID 010f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 27 34 36 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 36.8 Write 36.8 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 34.3 47% 34.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73% Very good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 26.6 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 22.5 64% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 85.1 47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	422x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	294x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	293x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	387x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	240x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	206x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $474

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16