HP Z230 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Z230 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1905
Memory11.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150720
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateNov 11 '20 at 20:46
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 56.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 182
62% 113 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 536
55% 442 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 16.4
16% 16.6 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 14.7
14% 18.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 217 219 216 217 214 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 450
Mixed 422
SusWrite 225
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 51.3
170% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 351
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
507GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 363 371 372 389 386 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 426
Mixed 420
SusWrite 367
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 50.9
167% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
342GB free
Firmware: AQ04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 159 157 161 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 152
Write 102
Mixed 81
SusWrite 159
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
849GB free
Firmware: AQ04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 200 201 203 203 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 151
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 202
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 117%
Great: 112%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 71 68 75 64 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46% Average
Read 65.7
Write 66
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 69.6
86% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.6
257% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 12.7
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z230 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 2,719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z230 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback