Colorful iCafe H310M-E PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Colorful iCafe H310M-E PRO (all builds)
Motherboard	Colorful iCafe H310M-E PRO
Memory	7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190401
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '20 at 03:55
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	MNG-User
Background CPU	59%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$95 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	57.9% Above average	Memory 54.6 1-Core 87.5 2-Core 179 58% 107 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 345 47% 349 Pts	64-Core 517 32% 517 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.6% Average	Lighting 58.8 Reflection 64.2 Parallax 52 48% 58.3 fps	MRender 58.4 Gravity 54.2 Splatting 58.7 47% 57.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Shinedisk M667 120G 120GB 237 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1205A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 42 25 42 41 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	Read 357 Write 88.5 Mixed 111 SusWrite 36.9 32% 148 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 11.6 4K Mixed 7.9 32% 10 MB/s	DQ Read 63.9 DQ Write 64.7 DQ Mixed 1.3 18% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 723GB free Firmware: HP51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 103 103 102 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 127 Write 85.5 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 102 72% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x16GB 15,722 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	32% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 10 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 5.5 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical iCafe H310M-E PRO Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

System: Colorful iCafe H310M-E PRO

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	2x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	2x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

SSD
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	2x
M667 256G 256GBShinediskBench 69%, 31 samples	1x

RAM
CL17-17-17 D4-2400 2x8GBUnknownBench 74%, 4,641 samples	2x
1x16GBUnknownBench 53%, 15,722 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $214

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16