Today's hottest deals

Compulab Micro Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompulab Micro Server  (all builds)
MotherboardCompuLab Micro Server
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '20 at 16:55
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3555LE
CPU Socket - soldered on-board, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 62.1
2-Core 100
49% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 174
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Intel(8086 2211) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 1.38
2% 2.03 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10JUCT-63J6SY0 1TB
849GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 56 77 90 101 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 81.9
Write 77.3
Mixed 40
SusWrite 82.6
52% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 62%
WD WD10JUCT-63J6SY0 1TB
926GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 98 106 107 108 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 112
Write 107
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 105
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.B2GCK.4200C 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18.2
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Micro Server Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Compulab Micro Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback