Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 91.8 1-Core 123 2-Core 236 85% 150 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 589 59% 481 Pts	64-Core 662 41% 662 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 87%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000H1 256GB 1,495 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT04H3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 314 312 311 290 307 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 356 Write 327 Mixed 318 SusWrite 306 74% 327 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 65.6 4K Mixed 24.5 88% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 341 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 297 223% 299 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GB 7,993 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	42.8% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 11.1 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 13.2 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 64.5 62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	286x
Quadro P600NvidiaBench 16%, 1,422 samples	230x
UHD Graphics P630IntelBench 5%, 2,578 samples	10x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	62x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	49x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $37Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	48x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	48x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples	41x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	29x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16