MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '20 at 10:14
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 159
2-Core 318
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 892
88% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,136
70% 1,136 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.3% Average
Lighting 46.7
Reflection 53.8
Parallax 43.8
38% 48.1 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 46.7
Splatting 60.9
48% 58.1 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 512G 512GB
349GB free
Firmware: 02K0S8FA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 418 416 420 420 418 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 423
Mixed 372
SusWrite 420
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 27.5
137% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 38.1
88% 176 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 99%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 298 221 204 196 188 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 307
Mixed 303
SusWrite 236
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 42.9
171% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 248
214% 317 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 102%
Great: 128%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
65GB free
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 232 225 224 219 212 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 472
Mixed 456
SusWrite 258
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 61
211% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 295
222% 296 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 115%
Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
74GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 147 146 146 146 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 483
Mixed 420
SusWrite 182
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 62.3
212% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 364
276% 371 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 114%
Great: 115%
HP S700 Pro 512GB-$79
254GB free
Firmware: S0410D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 425 418 422 421 419 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 459
Mixed 412
SusWrite 428
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 57.9
195% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 122
160% 289 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 124%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU880-36A180Z 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 36.9
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 39.1
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 15,803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $718
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback