Asus P8H77-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121012
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '20 at 07:49
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 90.4 1-Core 94.7 2-Core 176 72% 120 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 467 48% 387 Pts	64-Core 442 27% 442 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (64 fps cap detected)	51.3% Above average	Lighting 62.7 Reflection 64.8 Parallax 57 51% 61.5 fps	MRender 63.3 Gravity 61.4 Splatting 64 52% 62.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 56,609 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 59GB free Firmware: SBFK61F1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 214 212 210 209 208 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.1% Below average	Read 198 Write 96.3 Mixed 80.6 SusWrite 210 33% 146 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 17.3 4K Mixed 10.7 46% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 11 DQ Write 15.3 DQ Mixed 13.4 10% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 102%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 127GB 245 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 32GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 89 94 89 89 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 311 Write 95.7 Mixed 195 SusWrite 96.7 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 32.6 98% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 24.2 DQ Write 60.1 DQ Mixed 25.6 24% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 104%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 17.01H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 65 67 53 66 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 49.6 Write 44.7 Mixed 32 SusWrite 66.4 35% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 323GB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 178 180 181 180 179 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 116 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 177 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	57.5% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 18.6 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.9 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-M PRO Builds (Compare 703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M PRO - $360

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	187x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	78x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	64x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	20x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
F641GU67F1600G 1x8GBUnknownBench 29%, 191 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $802

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16