Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$175 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 70.8 2-Core 124 57% 92.1 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 383 37% 304 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 86B9) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.3% Average	Lighting 54.4 Reflection 56.4 Parallax 48.7 44% 53.2 fps	MRender 42.5 Gravity 51.7 Splatting 46.4 38% 46.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 708GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 332 355 373 376 358 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 399 Write 375 Mixed 342 SusWrite 338 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 39.2 126% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 36.6 DQ Write 89.7 DQ Mixed 51.2 42% 59.2 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 2x8GB 24,552 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.4% Average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 17.7 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 13.2 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	148x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	68x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,786 samples	61x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $366

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16