Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X430FA_S430FA

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X430FA_S430FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X430FA
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190528
Uptime	9.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '20 at 15:07
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	11%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 64.9 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 169 63% 111 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 450 50% 396 Pts	64-Core 492 30% 492 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1591) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.63% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 3.6 Parallax 3.4 2% 3.27 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 4.6 3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.63% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TNH-73A0A 256GB 586 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: 90000Q00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 134 135 130 125 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 352 Write 316 Mixed 317 SusWrite 166 65% 288 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 13.9 53% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 285 DQ Mixed 252 191% 254 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 86%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 723GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 82 84 84 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 59.7 Write 94.1 Mixed 59 SusWrite 82.9 54% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.3 87% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB 36,396 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.9% Above average	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 17.9 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 14.1 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X430FA_S430FA Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X430FA_S430FA

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	103x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	20x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	15x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	138x

SSD
SSDSCKKW256G8 256GBIntelBench 90%, 4,898 samples	39x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	21x
HFS256G39TNH-73A0A 256GBBench 69%, 586 samples	17x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GBSamsungBench 60%, 4,290 samples	30x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	22x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GBHynixBench 56%, 4,116 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16