Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T3500 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 09KPNV
Memory	10.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110420
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '20 at 18:29
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3565 7,121 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 80.8 2-Core 164 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 315 38% 291 Pts	64-Core 327 20% 327 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800 6,394 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB Ram: 768MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.01% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 8.7 Parallax 1.6 4% 5.2 fps	MRender 6.3 Gravity 3.5 Splatting 3.2 3% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.01% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 439GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 194 191 192 193 151 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.8% Above average	Read 169 Write 194 Mixed 170 SusWrite 186 41% 180 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 33.5 109% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 36.5 DQ Write 71.7 DQ Mixed 45.9 37% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	45.6% Average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 16.9 46% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 12.8 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $377

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16