Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D16 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory108.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime13.9 Days
Run DateMay 08 '17 at 06:10
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
64.2% Good
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 189
63% 137 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 726
68% 553 Pts
64-Core 726
49% 726 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$428
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
53% Above average
Lighting 199
Reflection 186
Parallax 197
52% 194 fps
MRender 156
Gravity 189
Splatting 135
53% 160 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
LSI MR9260-8i 4TB
6TB free
Firmware: 2.12
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$285
407GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 500
Write 400
Mixed 411
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 16.2
76% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 98.7
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 50.6
57% 95.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 135%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$364
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,655
Write 1,196
Mixed 1,347
311% 1,399 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 32.7
130% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 58.1
66% 112 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 185%
Great: 283%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$88
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 156
Write 130
Mixed 144
108% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.17
69% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 100%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$130
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 122
Write 131
Mixed 114
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 2.45
4K Mixed 0.23
102% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 86%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
30GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 44.8
Write 32.7
Mixed 38.4
48% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.96
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.14
101% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 35%
WD My Passport 259D 4TB
0GB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 94.3
Write 81.3
Mixed 68.4
101% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.27
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB RIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 31.4
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 18
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 137%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $885
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $154Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $224
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback