PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P35C-DS3R (all builds) |
Memory | 2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20090618 |
Uptime | 1.3 Days |
Run Date | Dec 03 '20 at 11:25 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5450-$195
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
54.6%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.06
|
18.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 320GB-$29
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 44 37 31 50 51 MB/s
|
24.7%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
16GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 45 40 35 50 51 MB/s
|
37%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
21.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 9x |
Core2 Duo E6750IntelBench 38%, 9,456 samples | 8x |
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 5x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $211 |