Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67

Performance Results

Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardFoxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67  (all builds)
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 13:29
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$20
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 24,986,640 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 76
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 147
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 302
40% 297 Pts
64-Core 296
20% 296 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Device(105B 0DCC) 277MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.4
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 57 50 50 51 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 122
Write 58.7
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 53.3
17% 76 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 8.1
39% 10.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Nanya M2Y1G64CB88A5N-CG 1x1GB
1 of 4 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
22.4% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 5.7
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 0.9
10% 3.47 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67 Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop 63%
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $203
The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback