HP Z200 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Z200 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B40h
Memory	7.3 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111129
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '20 at 16:05
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	KEN-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 86.1 2-Core 171 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 291 41% 304 Pts	64-Core 308 19% 308 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	3.17% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 1.1 3% 3.4 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.3 3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.17% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 225GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 89 78 101 90 104 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 106 Write 111 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 88.6 66% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 604GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 157 159 162 161 161 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Read 150 Write 144 Mixed 74.6 SusWrite 160 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ41UF8BCF0-DJ-F ID:04 43 RMR1870EC58E9F133 ID:04 43 RMR1870EC58E9F133 ID:80 CE M378B5273DH0-CH9 52GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.1% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 14.7 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z200 Workstation Builds (Compare 240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z200 Workstation

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	58x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	37x
Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples	29x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	19x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	17x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	16x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT351U7CFR8C-H9 ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:80 AD HMT351U7CFR8C-H9 ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F 48GBUnknownBench 25%, 15 samples	7x
ID:00 00 ID:00 00 44GBUnknownBench 26%, 101 samples	6x
ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 52GBUnknownBench 30%, 14 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $152

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16