Asrock FM2A55M-HD+

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A55M-HD+ (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150522
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 14 '17 at 01:47
Run Duration	376 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-4000 APU-$171 6,528 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 80.6 1-Core 47.6 2-Core 54.5 44% 60.9 Pts	4-Core 54.2 8-Core 62.1 8% 58.2 Pts	64-Core 69.1 4% 69.1 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 6150) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.89 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Lighting 35.3 Reflection 25.7 Parallax 32.5 29% 31.2 fps	MRender 38.8 Gravity 33.4 Splatting 32.3 28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 13953677 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 88751204204552 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 0 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 34 44 77312294946 (C2) HDA temperature 34 44 77312294946 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 13953677 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 13953677 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 13953677 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 21474836480 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4294963442 (EA) Unknown 0 0 29 (F1) Unknown 0 0 29 (F2) Unknown 0 0 36 (F4) Unknown 100 100 2424856	52.9% Above average	Read 261 Write 185 Mixed 199 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 20.7 85% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 54.9 59% 97.9 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 85%
Fujitsu MHV2080BH PL 80GB 522 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 34GB free Firmware: 00000029 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 11889 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 22347776 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 3103 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 8546985574418 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 3794 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 43776248 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3042 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 420 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 227140 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 227633987617 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 17 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 4746117138 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 91 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 94 94 13 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 17188 (CB) Run out cancel 100 100 2632804466267 (F0) Head flying hours 200 200 0	15.1% Very poor	Read 29 Write 23.4 Mixed 18 18% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 0.79 4K Mixed 0.17 48% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 21%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 8GB-$6 2,874 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	5.2% Terrible	Read 21.4 Write 3.52 Mixed 6.48 10% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.58 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.006 21% 1.86 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.2% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 1x8GB 1,017 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 7.3 20% 7.13 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 7.4 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A55M-HD+ Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-HD+

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	6x
A4-5300 APUAMD $36Bench 40%, 7,032 samples	5x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	4x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	4x
Radeon HD 6570AMDBench 5%, 19,220 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	2x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	3x
16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 1x4GBMicronBench 25%, 467 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $116

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16