Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics175% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateDec 15 '20 at 16:10
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$400
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 71.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 243
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 800
81% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,240
83% 1,240 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,376
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
175% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 203
Parallax 254
171% 223 fps
MRender 267
Gravity 217
Splatting 159
181% 214 fps
Poor: 140%
This bench: 175%
Great: 198%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1345 1318 1309 1273 1308 1299 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,850
Write 1,229
Mixed 805
SusWrite 1,309
290% 1,298 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 51
193% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,180
DQ Write 982
DQ Mixed 992
767% 1,051 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 261%
Great: 352%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
92GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 254 148 131 98 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 467
Mixed 337
SusWrite 194
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 48.7
173% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 342
261% 354 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$265
242GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1825 1665 1671 1676 1666 1722 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 1,978
Write 1,844
Mixed 1,319
SusWrite 1,704
385% 1,711 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 62.1
253% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,250
DQ Write 1,048
DQ Mixed 1,156
864% 1,151 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 311%
Great: 410%
Mushkin Chronos 90GB
42GB free
Firmware: 522ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 101 101 100 97 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 384
Write 129
Mixed 197
SusWrite 101
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 29.5
131% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 165
128% 179 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 69%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 171 162 162 167 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 235
Write 200
Mixed 98.8
SusWrite 165
128% 175 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 2
367% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 115%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2D3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2D3200C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.4% Above average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 15.4
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 11.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,546
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $268Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $304Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback