Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 123% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201209
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '20 at 18:48
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Memory 79.1 1-Core 157 2-Core 307 97% 181 Pts	4-Core 597 8-Core 1,119 102% 858 Pts	64-Core 2,096 130% 2,096 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Palit(1569 2206) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 460.89 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (143 fps cap detected)	113% Outstanding	Lighting 143 Reflection 143 Parallax 142 116% 143 fps	MRender 142 Gravity 142 Splatting 142 117% 142 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 221GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 933 84 97 97 100 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 1468 Write 726 Mixed 181 SusWrite 232 142% 652 MB/s	4K Read 61.5 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 58.6 203% 62 MB/s	DQ Read 634 DQ Write 80.7 DQ Mixed 111 144% 275 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 295%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB 5,677 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 141GB free Firmware: MZ6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 103 100 104 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 35.4 Write 75.7 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 102 42% 58 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.4 96% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 142GB free Firmware: CC34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 91 91 93 93 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 108 Write 105 Mixed 60.9 SusWrite 91.1 67% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.1 181% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 53GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 99 100 101 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 101 Write 67.1 Mixed 67.2 SusWrite 99.9 62% 83.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 113%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 124GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 150 155 154 155 155 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 56.5 Write 91 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 153 56% 78.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB 6,833 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2TB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 34.4 Write 30.2 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 37.8 24% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.5 172% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 95GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 62 60 58 64 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 106 Write 104 Mixed 32.1 SusWrite 60.7 55% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.5 201% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB 503 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	MC Read 34.5 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 30.6 90% 31.6 GB/s	SC Read 24.8 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 30.4 70% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 82.1 49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,402x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	539x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	532x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	318x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	226x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	206x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	170x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	134x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	244x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	183x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $673

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16