Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	98.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer LY325
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2160 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2160 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200320
Uptime	6.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '20 at 04:40
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	37%
CPU Throttled	86%

Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 70.9 1-Core 108 2-Core 156 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 321 37% 287 Pts	64-Core 316 20% 316 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% MSI(1462 3810) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.2% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 137 Parallax 183 103% 149 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 131 Splatting 92.7 89% 111 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 104%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA5-8D512 512GB 1,283 User benchmarks, average bench 181% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: CQ20901 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 485 243 333 302 296 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 1,434 Write 1,200 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 283 164% 745 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 18.5 91% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 815 DQ Write 35.7 DQ Mixed 62 136% 304 MB/s
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 261%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GB 7,828 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 40.8 MC Write 43.1 MC Mixed 39 117% 41 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 24.8 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 99.4 40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310 Builds (Compare 302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310

CPU
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	302x

GPU
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	166x
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 38%, 3,536 samples	105x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	3x

SSD
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	92x
CA5-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 181%, 1,283 samples	67x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	59x

RAM
K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GBSamsungBench 104%, 7,828 samples	246x
2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 3,676 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16