Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory116.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '20 at 13:23
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 182
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 728
64% 547 Pts
64-Core 2,406
149% 2,406 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Lighting 230
Reflection 186
Parallax 185
188% 200 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 178
Splatting 123
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 151%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,622
Write 1889
Mixed 2,950
624% 2,820 MB/s
4K Read 196
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 17
348% 89.4 MB/s
DQ Read 417
DQ Write 81.8
DQ Mixed 163
142% 221 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
55GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 854 758 745 643 666 632 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 2,112
Write 831
Mixed 607
SusWrite 716
234% 1,066 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 35.6
123% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 620
DQ Write 64.5
DQ Mixed 122
145% 269 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 181%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275
165GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 408 423 392 418 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 448
Write 419
Mixed 381
SusWrite 412
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 34.4
116% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 53.6
DQ Mixed 70.1
81% 146 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 135%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
459GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 119 125 127 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 122
Write 127
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 125
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
195% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 113%
Seagate M3 1TB
846GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 82 81 86 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 72.5
Write 99.5
Mixed 81
SusWrite 83.3
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 64%
SanDisk Extreme SSD 1TB
286GB free, PID 558c
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 404 389 411 400 388 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 396
Write 298
Mixed 278
SusWrite 396
457% 342 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 24
1,750% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 50.7
DQ Mixed 38.4
3,141% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 226%
Great: 342%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-16GTZSW Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3200C16-16GTZSW Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3200C16-16GTZSW Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3200C16-16GTZSW Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 128GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
125% Outstanding
MC Read 54.9
MC Write 52
MC Mixed 45.1
145% 50.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 16.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $290

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,594
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback