Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX506LI_FX506LI (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506LI
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200911
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '20 at 08:34
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 82,821 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Memory 87 1-Core 131 2-Core 246 86% 155 Pts	4-Core 437 8-Core 596 65% 516 Pts	64-Core 687 42% 687 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 84%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile) 33,798 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Asus(1043 1E91) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	45% Average	Lighting 56.1 Reflection 62.7 Parallax 53.4 46% 57.4 fps	MRender 62.1 Gravity 50.8 Splatting 49.2 44% 54 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 47%
Intel UHD Graphics 187,969 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1E91) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	5.71% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 63.3 Parallax 7.1 5% 25.5 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 6 Splatting 10.2 7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.71% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB 17,430 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 419GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFK52.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 779 912 924 734 921 924 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	172% Outstanding	Read 883 Write 911 Mixed 816 SusWrite 866 196% 869 MB/s	4K Read 36.9 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 57.4 202% 77.3 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 657 DQ Mixed 395 322% 445 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 185%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 19GB free, PID 5590 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 9.2 9.9 8 9.8 9 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 75.6 Write 17.5 Mixed 26.6 SusWrite 10.3 34% 32.5 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 2 138% 4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB 1,029 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.1% Good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 24.9 MC Mixed 19.8 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 23.6 SC Mixed 20.3 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	32x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples	9x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	31x
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples	10x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	15x
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	10x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	9x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	10x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples	10x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	7x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16