Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	97.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Memory 80 1-Core 134 2-Core 254 86% 156 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 501 66% 495 Pts	64-Core 605 37% 605 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 92%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CT2000P 2TB 118 User benchmarks, average bench 238% 688GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 837 832 631 162 160 208 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	97.2% Outstanding	Read 799 Write 854 Mixed 664 SusWrite 471 157% 697 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 57.5 4K Mixed 32.5 106% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 50.8 DQ Write 92.5 DQ Mixed 64.4 51% 69.2 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 321%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905744-022.A00G 2x31.5GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.6% Very good	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 25 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 35.4 SC Mixed 25.3 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	926x
GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 64%, 7,329 samples	619x
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples	91x

SSD
NVMe SK hynix 1TBPc611Bench 201%, 6,137 samples	134x
NVMe KIOXIA 1024GBKxg60znv1t02Bench 262%, 4,912 samples	109x
2300 NVMe 1024GBMicronBench 241%, 4,924 samples	96x

RAM
HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 2x16GBUnknownBench 86%, 2,975 samples	165x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	150x
M471A4G43AB1-CWE 2x31.5GBSamsungBench 92%, 2,607 samples	118x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16