Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 22:16
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 162
2-Core 325
104% 193 Pts
4-Core 649
8-Core 1,214
111% 931 Pts
64-Core 1,232
76% 1,232 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 107%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
EVGA(3842 2187) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 176
Parallax 178
151% 180 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 158
Splatting 131
130% 163 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 135%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 551 507 493 464 448 465 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 658
Write 1,632
Mixed 317
SusWrite 488
175% 774 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 61.8
201% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,244
DQ Write 1,408
DQ Mixed 1,302
987% 1,318 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 178%
Great: 277%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
27GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 90 85 87 87 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 259
Write 121
Mixed 164
SusWrite 87.3
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 26
133% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 78.5
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 99.5
76% 100 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
347GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 131 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 167
Write 132
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 133
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 176 173 177 179 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 124
Write 154
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 175
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 90%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
513GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 91 92 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 115
Write 118
Mixed 65.4
SusWrite 92.1
130% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2666 2OZ 04CB DDR4 2400 2OZ 04CB DDR4 2666 2OZ 04CB DDR4 2400 2OZ 32GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 29.6
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 28.7
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback