Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Memory 45.3 1-Core 21.6 2-Core 43 25% 36.6 Pts	4-Core 41.8 8-Core 41.9 6% 41.8 Pts	64-Core 40.6 2% 40.6 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3637) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5166 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 2.2 1% 1.93 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Londisk 240GB 240GB 350 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1008A SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 206 153 147 146 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 417 Write 373 Mixed 364 SusWrite 183 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 41.6 4K Mixed 29.7 98% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 99.1 DQ Write 86.3 DQ Mixed 95.9 71% 93.8 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 243GB free Firmware: KC67 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 93 105 106 104 108 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 109 Write 104 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 102 68% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Goodram GR1600S364L11/8G 1x8GB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 5.1 17% 5.93 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 179 22% 179 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16