Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	22.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2200-$54 8,325 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Memory 32.9 1-Core 21 2-Core 45.6 21% 33.2 Pts	4-Core 47.9 8-Core 48.6 6% 48.2 Pts	64-Core 48.9 3% 48.9 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 42%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 69 69 72 90 86 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.4% Poor	Read 98.5 Write 87.7 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 77 19% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 11.5 41% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 16.9 DQ Write 30.9 DQ Mixed 23.5 18% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 85%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 9GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 8.7 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	9.72% Terrible	Read 30.3 Write 5.7 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 7.2 14% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.4 92% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.72% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	9.76% Terrible	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3 9% 3.17 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.87 GB/s	Latency 238 17% 238 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.76% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium Dual E2200Intel $54Bench 33%, 8,325 samples	3x
Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	2x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	1x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $54

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16