Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	5.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '21 at 13:58
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	94%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 69.9 1-Core 84.9 2-Core 151 60% 102 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 307 37% 286 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Lighting 40.6 Reflection 45.9 Parallax 37 33% 41.2 fps	MRender 34.9 Gravity 39.1 Splatting 25.9 26% 33.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3K87RA SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 142 62 65 104 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 371 Write 353 Mixed 322 SusWrite 134 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 15 71% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 175 137% 192 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 751GB free Firmware: AX0R5J SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 112 112 112 113 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 95.2 Write 98.9 Mixed 34.8 SusWrite 111 62% 85 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 1x8GB 3,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 10.5 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 8.4 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,177x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	681x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	211x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	302x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	207x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $295Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	205x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	247x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	152x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	87x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	115x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	56x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $359

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16