Asus Z97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 21:04
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 94.9
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 153
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 232
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33% Below average
Lighting 42.1
Reflection 45.6
Parallax 40.7
34% 42.8 fps
MRender 36.2
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 35.5
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 3.2 72 5.2 19 157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 433
Write 345
Mixed 212
SusWrite 71.1
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 4.8
39% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 34.9
DQ Write 43.8
DQ Mixed 39.6
30% 39.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
195GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 119 112 122 123 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 122
Write 124
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 120
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 88%
WD Elements 1TB
107GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 36 38 38 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 36
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 37.5
47% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,030 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97M-PLUS - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $998
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback