Lenovo 20240

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemLenovo 20240  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G505
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '21 at 21:21
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD E1-2100 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
6.24% Terrible
Memory 7.25
1-Core 14.8
2-Core 27.3
9% 16.4 Pts
4-Core 30.5
8-Core 29.4
4% 30 Pts
64-Core 27.3
2% 27.3 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.24%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 8210
Legend(17AA 3802) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Patriot P210 512GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H201126a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 107 106 130 47 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 294
Write 279
Mixed 312
SusWrite 121
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 16.3
54% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 57.9
DQ Write 51.9
DQ Mixed 52.1
40% 54 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CMSO8GX3M1C1600C11 RMT3170EF68F9W1600 12GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.53 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 430
9% 430 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 20240 Builds (Compare 369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $35
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $300Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $100G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback