Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results


Gaming 108% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 101% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-DELUXE II (all builds)
Memory	60.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '21 at 13:40
Run Duration	357 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 3,842 User benchmarks, average bench 83% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Memory 87.2 1-Core 94.7 2-Core 253 79% 145 Pts	4-Core 471 8-Core 835 79% 653 Pts	64-Core 999 62% 999 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 8674) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	120% Outstanding	Lighting 156 Reflection 170 Parallax 177 127% 168 fps	MRender 186 Gravity 138 Splatting 124 119% 149 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asus RAIDR Express PCIe 1,224 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 188GB free Firmware: MV.R00-0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 340 334 332 335 322 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	Read 573 Write 454 Mixed 382 SusWrite 331 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 64.8 4K Mixed 29 115% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 381 DQ Mixed 211 189% 280 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 101%
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$194 3,881 User benchmarks, average bench 158% 373GB free (System drive) Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 340 336 339 317 222 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 585 Write 577 Mixed 509 SusWrite 317 112% 497 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 83.9 4K Mixed 43.1 140% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 772 DQ Write 665 DQ Mixed 493 431% 643 MB/s
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 211%
WDC WD120EFAX-68UNTN0 12TB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 5.5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 121 123 124 127 155 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 188 Write 200 Mixed 86.1 SusWrite 129 34% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 10.3 4K Mixed 0.7 9% 4.23 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 5.9 DQ Mixed 1.6 2% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 22%
Mushkin Scorpion Deluxe PCIe 480GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 443GB free Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 241 103 63 51 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 273 Write 326 Mixed 355 SusWrite 126 61% 270 MB/s	4K Read 8.8 4K Write 54.1 4K Mixed 16.3 63% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 359 DQ Mixed 202 173% 247 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 156%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 89 86 88 89 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	71% Very good	Read 160 Write 136 Mixed 82.1 SusWrite 87.6 86% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 100%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180 4,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 113 114 117 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	67% Good	Read 118 Write 123 Mixed 69.1 SusWrite 115 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.4 237% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180 4,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 118 116 119 134 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 114 Write 119 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 120 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.3 219% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180 4,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 135 136 137 141 154 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Read 173 Write 117 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 140 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.3 207% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 97%
WD WD141KRYZ-01C66B0 14TB 230 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 8.5TB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 122 122 134 175 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 137%
WD Gold 10TB (2016)-$226 1,110 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 764GB free Firmware: 01.01H02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 126 131 127 130 128 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 225 Write 215 Mixed 97.4 SusWrite 128 122% 167 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 1.1 288% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 133%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 6TB 114 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 4TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 164 164 165 164 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 143 Write 144 Mixed 112 SusWrite 164 104% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 102%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 6TB 114 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 5.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 173 173 169 171 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	98.3% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 169 Mixed 124 SusWrite 172 117% 159 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB 624 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	120% Outstanding	MC Read 44.4 MC Write 54 MC Mixed 43.8 135% 47.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 22 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	200x
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	169x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	177x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	63x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	42x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	40x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	18x
CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 32GBCorsairBench 134%, 17 samples	16x
CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- 32GBCorsairBench 127%, 15 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,076

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)