Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51 10,924 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Memory 46 1-Core 47.6 2-Core 48.8 32% 47.5 Pts	4-Core 46.8 8-Core 49.4 6% 48.1 Pts	64-Core 49.1 3% 49.1 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8370D 5,124 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 7721) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.26% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 2.3 2% 3.13 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 3.5 2% 3.07 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.26% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
120gb SATA Flash Drive 120GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: SFPA001N SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 94 59 62 62 63 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 57%
Seagate ST3320310CS 320GB 4,266 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 298GB free Firmware: SC14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 83 85 84 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 87 Write 83.2 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 83.9 53% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB 1,247 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 8.6 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 176 23% 176 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	13x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	8x
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	6x

RAM
99U5471-054.A00LF F3-1600C11-4GNT 12GBKingstonBench 31%, 11 samples	4x
99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 12,132 samples	3x
F3-14900CL9-4GBXL F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 245 samples	3x

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $324

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16