Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	75.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	40.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180628
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '21 at 15:08
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399 38,086 User benchmarks, average bench 91% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Memory 81.9 1-Core 128 2-Core 241 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 781 74% 615 Pts	64-Core 983 61% 983 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 102%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7) 147,588 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 872F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	6.99% Terrible	Lighting 7.7 Reflection 10.4 Parallax 9 6% 9.03 fps	MRender 9.5 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 12.4 8% 9.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.99% Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% EVGA(3842 6775) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.8% Very good	Lighting 95.6 Reflection 100 Parallax 92.8 78% 96.1 fps	MRender 75.4 Gravity 100 Splatting 86.6 72% 87.5 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 480GB-$900 1,995 User benchmarks, average bench 429% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: E2010435 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1341 1349 1382 1088 1364 1474 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	283% Outstanding	Read 1,801 Write 1,401 Mixed 1,534 SusWrite 1,333 341% 1,517 MB/s	4K Read 159 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 64.3 348% 89.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,168 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 202 258% 492 MB/s
Poor: 280% ↑ This bench: 283% Great: 541%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 749GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1603 1536 1440 953 1007 943 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	240% Outstanding	Read 2,082 Write 1573 Mixed 1,266 SusWrite 1247 345% 1,542 MB/s	4K Read 47.4 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 47.5 160% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,328 DQ Write 91.2 DQ Mixed 180 265% 533 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 240% Great: 372%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB 2,983 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	62.3% Good	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 20.2 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 16.8 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 131%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	50x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	84x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	35x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	30x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $721

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16