Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Intel HuronRiver Platform
Motherboard	Intel Emerald Lake (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120822
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '21 at 17:46
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 153 62% 104 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 378 41% 324 Pts	64-Core 378 23% 378 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gainward(10B0 0F00) 2GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	3.43% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 5 Parallax 1.3 3% 3.5 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 4.6 Splatting 3.7 3% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.43% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix SH920 2.5 128GB 854 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1010BL00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 293 286 289 286 282 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 318 Write 284 Mixed 215 SusWrite 284 62% 275 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 41.7 4K Mixed 20.6 70% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 21 DQ Write 98.2 DQ Mixed 25.2 29% 48.1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT4G3S1339M.C16F1K 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.5% Average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 14.8 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 76.1 53% 76.1 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	87x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	7x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	3x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	8x
SH564128FH8NZPHSCR 2x4GBSmartBench 42%, 520 samples	6x
9905428-417.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 51%, 1,179 samples	5x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $199

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16