Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 7 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Memory 83.7 1-Core 57.8 2-Core 113 54% 85 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 275 28% 229 Pts	64-Core 278 17% 278 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 2114) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.54% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.97 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.54% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0C SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 344 260 267 243 253 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 347 Write 311 Mixed 331 SusWrite 284 72% 318 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 32.9 4K Mixed 22.5 73% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 293 DQ Mixed 156 142% 212 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 6GB 426 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	38.7% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 12.3 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 10.8 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	61x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	44x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	13x

RAM
HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 6GBHynixBench 38%, 426 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	14x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 6GBHynixBench 40%, 239 samples	6x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $200

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16