To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '21 at 17:23
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0 6,987 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 67.6 2-Core 177 63% 110 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 641 59% 494 Pts	64-Core 862 53% 862 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3287) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 440.97 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.3% Average	Lighting 59.2 Reflection 59.8 Parallax 57.1 48% 58.7 fps	MRender 39.6 Gravity 43.1 Splatting 57.8 40% 46.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 852 427 431 432 432 427 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	189% Outstanding	Read 1,787 Write 1,999 Mixed 1,463 SusWrite 500 322% 1,437 MB/s	4K Read 48.9 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 63.3 209% 71.2 MB/s	DQ Read 571 DQ Write 390 DQ Mixed 525 380% 495 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 302%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 55GB free Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 75 57 57 7.5 52 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Read 501 Write 441 Mixed 426 SusWrite 106 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 29.9 133% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 0.4 83% 198 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41HE4BDFA- Samsung M393B5170FH0- Samsung M393B5170FH0- EBJ41HE4BDFA- 16GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	94.7% Outstanding	MC Read 39.7 MC Write 38.6 MC Mixed 34.1 107% 37.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 12.3 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	712x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	616x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16