PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H81M-DG4 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150723 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 25 '21 at 17:39 |
Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
53.3%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 303 88 55 7.8 67 MB/s
|
29.8%
Poor
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Spark 16GB
9GB free, PID 55a1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8.7 11 9.8 9.8 11 MB/s
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
46.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 80x |
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples | 35x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 35x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 40x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 34x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 28x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $237 |