Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200729
Uptime14.6 Days
Run DateJan 29 '21 at 09:22
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 81
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 798
78% 638 Pts
64-Core 1,317
82% 1,317 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.1% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 102
Parallax 205
82% 136 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 145
Splatting 96.1
92% 114 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 600 272 267 263 260 263 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 2422
Write 1,364
Mixed 1,262
SusWrite 321
296% 1,342 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 73
242% 84.3 MB/s
DQ Read 962
DQ Write 696
DQ Mixed 909
657% 856 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 229%
Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
104GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 454 457 458 453 444 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 460
Mixed 421
SusWrite 452
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 47.8
158% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 309
249% 351 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 114%
Great: 125%
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
69GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 142 165 166 164 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 505
Write 480
Mixed 376
SusWrite 177
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 35.8
127% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 194
192% 305 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 95%
WD WD7500AAVS-00D7B0 750GB
794GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 69 70 68 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 68.3
Write 56.5
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 68.7
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 50%
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB
169GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 105 107 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 97.6
Write 48.4
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 106
58% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 30.1
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 25.2
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback