Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	90.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201204
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 31 '21 at 21:02
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Memory 91.2 1-Core 110 2-Core 222 81% 141 Pts	4-Core 441 8-Core 875 78% 658 Pts	64-Core 1,448 90% 1,448 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.7% Outstanding	Lighting 113 Reflection 128 Parallax 111 92% 117 fps	MRender 135 Gravity 99.2 Splatting 94.4 88% 110 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 265GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 329 374 373 372 372 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 471 Write 409 Mixed 405 SusWrite 356 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 28.9 92% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 178 139% 192 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 125%
OCZ Vertex 460 240GB-$203 1,730 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 133GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 329 368 366 366 367 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 410 Write 371 Mixed 370 SusWrite 350 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 22.6 4K Mixed 16 51% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 251 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 148 127% 189 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 105%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 125 122 125 126 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 116 Write 121 Mixed 88.5 SusWrite 123 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 83%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 131 128 127 131 130 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 129 Write 123 Mixed 77 SusWrite 128 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 100%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230 19,674 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 146 145 146 145 146 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 120 Write 116 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 144 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 2.3 405% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 94%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230 19,674 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1TB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 146 146 147 146 146 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 121 Write 88.3 Mixed 64.9 SusWrite 146 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 2.3 406% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 94%
Jmicron Corp. 3TB 994GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 153 155 154 154 153 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.3% Good	Read 154 Write 153 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 152 186% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.9 130% 1.57 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GB 4,937 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	89.3% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 35.8 90% 31.6 GB/s	SC Read 24.6 SC Write 26.8 SC Mixed 33.1 80% 28.2 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,636x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,258x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,408x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,233x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,071x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,465x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,834x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,104x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	864x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	769x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	645x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $933

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16