Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Memory 28.5 1-Core 8.5 2-Core 12.6 13% 16.5 Pts	4-Core 13.2 8-Core 14.2 2% 13.7 Pts	64-Core 16.7 1% 16.7 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7400M 4,688 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C589) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	0.7% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 0.7 1% 1 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.5 0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.7% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HN-M101MBB 1TB-$45 3,466 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 735GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AR1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 28 23 46 31 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 13.7 Write 11.6 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 33.2 13% 17.2 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AD73I1C1674EV 2x4GB 1,403 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	7.36% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 3.1 7% 2.5 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 0.9 SC Mixed 1.2 4% 1.23 GB/s	Latency 263 15% 263 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 7.36% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	16x
E-350AMDBench 25%, 6,654 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 7400MAMDBench 2%, 4,688 samples	19x
Radeon HD 6470MAMDBench 2%, 4,805 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	5x
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	2x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	2x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16