Apple MacBookPro11,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemApple MacBookPro11,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-189A3D4F975D5FFC
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201202
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '21 at 11:44
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4278U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 160
59% 104 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 211
30% 218 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5100 (Mobile 1.1 GHz)
Apple(106B 011A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 7.3
4% 5.1 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 6
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256F 251GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM2JA1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 600
Write 497
Mixed 380
109% 492 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 24.3
94% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 451
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 202
184% 288 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D54343531533641465238412D50422020 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.9% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 13
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro11,1 Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro11,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback