Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '21 at 08:22
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 206
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 383
49% 369 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.6% Average
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 187
Parallax 195
0% 128 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 182
Splatting 126
119% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 31 28 35 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 49
Write 40.7
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 29.3
28% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.1
36% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 152 149 151 148 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 142
Write 138
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 149
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
787GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 185 179 176 164 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 51.7
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 178
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 112%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 105 105 103 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 77
Write 74.3
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 104
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 108 108 101 101 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 66.5
Write 69.8
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 101
54% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 67%
WDC WD80 EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB
6TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 38
Write 37.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 1.1
35% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 49%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 32 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 37.7
Write 38
Mixed 30
SusWrite 34.1
47% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 48%
WDC WD10 0EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
159GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 38.5
Write 38.3
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 3.2
36% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.3
221% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 85%
WDC WD10 0EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
9TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 38.5
Write 38.5
Mixed 33
SusWrite 4.6
37% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99[2/7/4]031 1314 991998 (996998) 1314 991998 (996998) 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.1% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 1,700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 - $162

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $810
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback