Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '21 at 17:32
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$258 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 92.5 1-Core 145 2-Core 295 97% 177 Pts	4-Core 583 8-Core 1,094 100% 839 Pts	64-Core 1,104 68% 1,104 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.1% Poor	Lighting 33.3 Reflection 33.8 Parallax 33.2 27% 33.4 fps	MRender 35.9 Gravity 36.9 Splatting 28.1 27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M6S 128GB-$106 3,356 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 276 300 291 283 302 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 449 Write 317 Mixed 248 SusWrite 292 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 29.2 4K Mixed 19.3 70% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 62 DQ Write 55.7 DQ Mixed 61.2 45% 59.6 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 100%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 161GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1162 1148 610 612 612 611 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	148% Outstanding	Read 1,550 Write 1,411 Mixed 1,125 SusWrite 792 273% 1,220 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 32.9 107% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 91.9 DQ Write 71.4 DQ Mixed 78.4 60% 80.6 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 340%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 122GB free Firmware: M3CR010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 376 370 334 394 387 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Read 460 Write 415 Mixed 414 SusWrite 372 94% 415 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 24.3 80% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 62.2 DQ Write 54.8 DQ Mixed 58.2 44% 58.4 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB 87,241 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.2% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 21.1 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 21.5 62% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	680x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	577x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	478x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	584x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	417x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	381x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	315x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $65Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	284x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $160Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	245x

Value: 120% - Outstanding

Total price: $883

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16