Lenovo 20EQS2J101

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20EQS2J101  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EQS2J101
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '21 at 15:45
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 213
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 509
57% 446 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000M
Legend(17AA 222E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1137 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.66
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 18.5
13% 17.5 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 15.9
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GDNU A 512GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYLA0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 358 233 319 263 266 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 464
Write 344
Mixed 395
SusWrite 281
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 34.7
108% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 309
227% 297 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 24
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback