Lenovo 20EQS2J101

Performance Results

Gaming 18%
Desktop 76%
Workstation 16%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemLenovo 20EQS2J101  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EQS2J101
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '21 at 15:45
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 478
53% 407 Pts
64-Core 470
32% 470 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000M
Legend(17AA 222E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1137 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.66
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 18.5
13% 17.5 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 15.9
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 18%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GDNU A 512GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYLA0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 358 233 319 263 266 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 464
Write 344
Mixed 395
SusWrite 281
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 34.7
108% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 309
227% 297 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 24
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 20EQS2J101 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 18%
Desktop 73%
Workstation 16%

System: Lenovo 20EQS2J101

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback