Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '21 at 18:52
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Memory 90.4 1-Core 117 2-Core 233 83% 147 Pts	4-Core 467 8-Core 460 62% 464 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 36.5 Reflection 40.8 Parallax 38 30% 38.4 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 27.3 28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 120GB 120GB 1,949 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 395 275 79 66 58 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 461 Write 388 Mixed 373 SusWrite 201 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 32.8 147% 56.1 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 52.8 91% 173 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 95%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 898GB free Firmware: AX0A3M SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 98 99 99 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 97.1 Write 96.1 Mixed 34 SusWrite 98 59% 81.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 1x8GB 3,719 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	44.8% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 11.9 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 12.9 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2V 2.0 Builds (Compare 643 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	225x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	205x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	36x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	60x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	48x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	36x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	26x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	23x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	11x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $320

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16