| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock B365M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190515 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 26 '21 at 07:46 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
89.9%
Excellent
|
86% 154 Pts
|
72% 563 Pts
|
43% 690 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
76.4%
Very good
|
79% 109 fps
|
71% 88.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 240GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 355 421 434 143 6.1 MB/s
|
45.7%
Average
|
59% 266 MB/s
|
51% 14.9 MB/s
|
9% 13.3 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
151GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 175 176 182 181 182 MB/s
|
98.5%
Outstanding
|
103% 141 MB/s
|
139% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
69.9%
Good
|
72% 25.1 GB/s
|
53% 18.5 GB/s
|
61% 65.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B365M-HDV Builds (Compare 2,251 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B365M-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 814x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 264x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 119x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 168x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 159x |
| RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 146x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $335 |