Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E6700-$199 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 40% XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Memory 45.6 1-Core 22.1 2-Core 47.5 26% 38.4 Pts	4-Core 62 8-Core 67.6 8% 64.8 Pts	64-Core 57.4 4% 57.4 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel G45/G43 Express Chipset 6,554 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 D620) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.39% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.53 fps	MRender 0.5 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 0.5 0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.39% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 128GB 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 82 50 79 63 46 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.4% Poor	Read 148 Write 95.9 Mixed 114 SusWrite 63.3 24% 105 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 17.9 4K Mixed 13 41% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 32.8 DQ Write 36.4 DQ Mixed 10.9 15% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-002.A00LF 1x2GB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 3.2 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 2.4 8% 2.67 GB/s	Latency 178 22% 178 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,138x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,037x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	820x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16