PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121115 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 01 '21 at 16:22 |
Run Duration | 212 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 31% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core-$81
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
|
30%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia(10DE 145C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.2%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 121 92 98 91 80 MB/s
|
63.5%
Good
|
|||
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80
64GB free
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 161 217 214 186 104 MB/s
|
58.3%
Above average
|
|||
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
57GB free
Firmware: 5.6.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 142 166 165 130 97 MB/s
|
54.1%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba MK1059GS 1TB
844GB free
Firmware: GU00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 106 104 74 24 MB/s
|
||||
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
40GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.4 14 15 17 15 MB/s
|
11.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 563x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 138x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 79x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 67x |
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 62x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 59x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $610 |