Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics75.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateMar 01 '21 at 17:01
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 120
54% 87 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 339
33% 272 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.8% Very good
Lighting 92.9
Reflection 102
Parallax 93.4
76% 96 fps
MRender 91.4
Gravity 94.3
Splatting 92.4
76% 92.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 177 164 141 128 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 343
Write 289
Mixed 188
SusWrite 152
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 28.7
104% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 134
125% 194 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 114%
SSD 240GB
126GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 110 63 64 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 427
Write 323
Mixed 310
SusWrite 104
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 23.8
106% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 160
139% 205 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 95%
Adata SU635 480GB-$40
175GB free
Firmware: S1120A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 266 319 18 28 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 468
Write 384
Mixed 357
SusWrite 158
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 24.3
94% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 0.4
49% 114 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 103%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
87GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 183 111 88 88 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 99.8
Write 384
Mixed 330
SusWrite 130
54% 236 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 12.3
58% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 123
126% 204 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 88%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0739
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 29 29 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 30
Write 25.7
Mixed 23
SusWrite 28.5
20% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 32GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.2% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 10.9
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback